WinLoG Mineral Exploration QA/QC Example

WinLoG mineral exploration QA/QC drill-hole log for ME-01 GOLD-QAQC View Full Log
ME-01 GOLD-QAQC
2-page log 2 Errors / 4 Warnings
MINERAL EXPLORATION VALIDATION EXAMPLE

WinLoG Mineral Exploration QA/QC Example

Integrated validation of drill-core recovery, geological logging, alteration, veins, multi-element assays, and laboratory QA/QC.

This example shows how WinLoG applies automated QA/QC to a mineral exploration drill hole. ME-01 GOLD-QAQC combines detailed geology and mineralization descriptions, core samples and recovery, Au, Ag, Cu and As results, alteration and vein logging, and depth-linked validation findings over a 35 m borehole.

The data deliberately includes excessive core recovery, missing required Au and As results, conflicting duplicate Au assays, a high-grade Au result without a corresponding vein observation, and logged mineralization without a required assay. Each finding is linked to the affected sample, interval, analyte and actual value in the validation report.

Mineral Exploration Diamond Core Au / Ag / Cu / As Alteration & Veins Core Recovery Automated Validation XML Template

Download Complete Example Back to Example Library

Capabilities Demonstrated

What This Mineral Exploration Example Shows

Geological Record

  • 35 m exploration drill hole
  • Ten geological intervals
  • Lithology and mineralization
  • Weathering and intrusive contacts
  • Alteration descriptions
  • Vein abundance and character

Core Sampling

  • Twelve half-core samples
  • Unique MX sample identifiers
  • Start depth and sample length
  • Recovered core length
  • Sample-to-assay association
  • Depth-based completeness

Assay Results

  • Gold and silver in g/t
  • Copper in ppm
  • Arsenic results
  • Four graphical assay tracks
  • Required-result completeness
  • Duplicate result detection

Validation

  • Recovery versus sample length
  • Missing required analytes
  • Conflicting primary assays
  • Assay-geology cross-checks
  • 96% assay completeness
  • Detailed validation reporting

How the Example Demonstrates Mineral Exploration QA/QC

The example contains deliberate geological, sampling and assay data-quality conditions rather than only idealized data. Sample MX-003 records 3.25 m of recovery for a 3.0 m interval, while MX-002 and MX-005 are missing required As and Au results. Two different primary Au values are recorded for MX-009.

The validation report contains 2 errors and 4 warnings. Required assay coverage is calculated from 46 populated sample-analyte slots out of 48 expected slots, producing 96% completeness.

Example Findings

Selected QA/QC Conditions Demonstrated

Sampling and Assay Errors

  • MX-003 recovery of 3.25 m exceeds its 3.0 m sample length
  • MX-009 contains conflicting primary Au results of 0.65 and 6.5 g/t
  • Duplicate results count once for completeness
  • Affected sample, analyte and depth are identified
  • Errors require correction before technical use

Completeness and Geological Cross-Checks

  • As is missing for MX-002 from 3.0 to 6.0 m
  • Au is missing for MX-005 from 12.0 to 15.0 m
  • Au of 12.4 g/t occurs where no veins are logged
  • Logged mineralization is cross-checked against required Au assays
  • Warnings require geological or laboratory review

Download the Complete Example

Download the example files individually. The XML template and log can be imported into WinLoG Version 6 and customized for company, deposit, laboratory, commodity and exploration-program QA/QC requirements.

Included in the Example

  • Professional two-page exploration drill-hole log
  • Three-page validation report
  • Reusable mineral exploration QA/QC XML template
  • ME-01 GOLD-QAQC XML borehole data
  • Deliberate errors and warnings for training and demonstration
Applications

Who This Example Is For

Exploration Geologists

Demonstrates an integrated workflow for geological logging, alteration, veins, core recovery, sample tracking, assays and automated QA/QC.

Mineral Exploration Programs

Useful for gold and base-metal drilling programs, target evaluation, resource-definition drilling and geological database preparation.

Database and QA/QC Teams

Shows how sample completeness, assay conflicts, recovery and geological observations can be reviewed together before data are approved for interpretation.

Customize This Mineral Exploration Example for Your Organization

WinLoG templates can be customized for deposit geology, alteration and vein terminology, commodity-specific assay suites, sampling procedures, laboratory QA/QC thresholds, company standards and governed review workflows.

Contact GAEA Technologies